Amen lets do it. Get back to its founding its so perverted ,taxes ,surveillance,wars not declared by congress everthing funded indebtedness 18 intel agencies working on American soil against Americans shall not be infringed
Ann, I have to say Trump is right about everything past the original 13th Amendment. I'll say I'm not sure about Trump for various reasons, but I can tell you he was sent all the information regarding the Avilla and other American Trusts, and all the fraud perpetrated against the American people. Besides you have to ask which constitution?
1787 by the 4th body of the American government and 1st Federal subcontractor?
Of course I know you're aware everything changed when the subcontractors took over during and especially after the so called Civil War (mercenary conflict).
I know you've done many interviews regarding correcting your status and the fraud schemes, but have you ever interviewed Ann Von Reitz?
The TASA website has these and other documents available, she has gone into this in depth about the corporate governments. Those of us who've corrected our status as members of one of the 50 State Assemblies enacted Lawfully are recorded on the Land and Soil.
Ask yourself if the 50 American States Assemblies claiming to be the true American government, and Anna claiming to be
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
Do you honestly believe that we wouldn't be raided by the British Territorial subcontractors like they did at Mara Lago, and shut us down?
All of the public notices she posts are sent to the various government offices and agents, as well as the Vatican, BIS, and those needing to be noticed by registered mail, and Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
One of her articles detailing the impersonation scheme
They are not talking about throwing out the constitution! What they are saying is restore the original 13th amendment as ratified in 1819 then changed without a single Vote of citizens or congress in 1865 which also led to the Rothschilds/Rockefellers to steal thus country by, buying up all of the 30 year bonds congress sold supposedly to us(citizens) after the Civil War wich was this countries first bankruptcy, which they expected would bring the country back to even keel financially, but in 1903 a Rothschild and a Rockefeller interrupted congress by saying we have all of these 30 year bonds and you owe us X amount plus interest, subsequently bankrupting this country again, then convinced congress to start the first national bank later to become the federal reserve which is neither federal or a reserve!
It would've also precluded Lincoln from serving in the unincorporated bodies of the American government, and was part of the cause of the south walking out of session that's never discussed, and that caused the third and fourth bodies to be dissolved. See my post about the 3 constitutions with links I just left on here.
"In this case the Plaintiff asks the United States Supreme Court to provide declaratory relief and to restore the Original 13th Amendment and provide restitution…."
" So why isn’t it in effect right now? And is this something that the United States Supreme Court can correct?"
Update: Time to End the Civil War: the Necessity of Expatriation
"I am republishing here the entire complete text of research on what really happened at the end of the Civil War---- and I want everyone reading this to note that there was never a formal Peace Treaty ending the Civil War, just declarations by President Johnson proclaiming peace on the land jurisdiction. (See below.)"
They are not talking about throwing out the constitution! What they are saying is restore the original 13th amendment as ratified in 1819 then changed without a single Vote of citizens or congress in 1865 which also led to the Rothschilds/Rockefellers to steal thus country by, buying up all of the 30 year bonds congress sold supposedly to us(citizens) after the Civil War wich was this countries first bankruptcy, which they expected would bring the country back to even keel financially, but in 1903 a Rothschild and a Rockefeller interrupted congress by saying we have all of these 30 year bonds and you owe us X amount plus interest, subsequently bankrupting this country again, then convinced congress to start the first national bank later to become the federal reserve which is neither federal or a reserve!
It seems like conflating two discussions. One about the veracity of the 13th Amendment as currently written and another about Trump saying the 2020 election was so fraudulent that it warrants tossing out all rules, regulations and even the Constitution for a remedy. On the latter, the fraud has to be identified and prosecuted before we can even contemplate something as radical as ignoring the Constitution and presumably using military force to seek a remedy. As an aside, I agree that you can't serve two masters and all of our "dual citizens" in Congress bother me greatly.
The proof is out there and nothing is getting done about it because we the people are not demanding it. Joe Biden facts... 2012 as Vice President committed quid pro quo to Ukraine to remove their government's version of theor attorney General from investigating Buristma gas and oil where his son Hunter worked just after being booted out of the Navy Reserve For drug use, as well as all the proof that has come out of congressional hearings that have also found proof that the Biden family took millions from both Ukraine and CCP China before even being elected as president, all that proof has come out and is public knowledge yet he is still the president!....hmm want more facts?
The Biden crime family needs to be prosecuted along with many others from the DC Swamp cesspool, but I'm not sure what this has to do with the 13th Amendment or Trump's call to ignore laws, rules and the constitution because of election fraud.
I read his statement as corruptions want to do the things that you are saying Trump wants to. Or did I read it wrong. After all, it is the subject of the sentence. Nowhere did I see that Trump wants this.
When Trump is elected President why not do what President Lincoln did in 1863:
Habeas Corpus Suspension Act
Tuesday, March 3, 1863
Only for duration of civil unrest?
Representative Thaddeus Stevens introduced the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act in December 1862. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.
Representative Thaddeus Stevens introduced the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act in December 1862. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act authorizes the president of the United States to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, which normally enforces the right of a prisoner's case to be examined by a judge to determine if their detainment is lawful. Six months after the act, on September 15, 1863, President Lincoln suspends habeas corpus throughout the Union for any cases relating to prisoners of war, spies, traitors, or Union soldiers. It allows for extended detainment of prisoners without jury trials. At the end of the war, President Andrew Johnson uses the act to overturn a writ of habeas corpus issued in the case of Mary Surratt, who is implicated in the assassination of Lincoln and later executed despite the continuing legal questions over her arrest and conviction. After the war, the suspension gradually resides in the North and South, as various provisions expire or are repealed or replaced.
Re-read what the original 13th amendment stated that would instantly remove the likes of the Biden family and all others that that have done the same to include the Bush family
IF congress does not pass an amendment and send it to states to ratify—then a new convention would have to be held and you DO NOT want that. delegates to a convention have plenipotenary powers.
Amen lets do it. Get back to its founding its so perverted ,taxes ,surveillance,wars not declared by congress everthing funded indebtedness 18 intel agencies working on American soil against Americans shall not be infringed
Now we're talking! You get it! Bravo!
Ann, I have to say Trump is right about everything past the original 13th Amendment. I'll say I'm not sure about Trump for various reasons, but I can tell you he was sent all the information regarding the Avilla and other American Trusts, and all the fraud perpetrated against the American people. Besides you have to ask which constitution?
1787 by the 4th body of the American government and 1st Federal subcontractor?
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/uscode/uscode1958-00100/uscode1958-001000011/uscode1958-001000011.pdf
1789 by the 5th body and 2nd Federal, but 1st incorporated subcontractor the British Territorial government?
https://mega.nz/file/l5EzzYCD#hjJnqA44036bCMeR2g2TtuMEMd5WWo6LrhchYH9Vg_k
1790 by the 6th and final body and 3rd Federal, and 2nd Incorporated subcontractor the Holy Roman Empire aka Vatican after Constantinople.
https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbpe.1670010a/
Of course I know you're aware everything changed when the subcontractors took over during and especially after the so called Civil War (mercenary conflict).
I know you've done many interviews regarding correcting your status and the fraud schemes, but have you ever interviewed Ann Von Reitz?
The TASA website has these and other documents available, she has gone into this in depth about the corporate governments. Those of us who've corrected our status as members of one of the 50 State Assemblies enacted Lawfully are recorded on the Land and Soil.
Ask yourself if the 50 American States Assemblies claiming to be the true American government, and Anna claiming to be
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
Do you honestly believe that we wouldn't be raided by the British Territorial subcontractors like they did at Mara Lago, and shut us down?
All of the public notices she posts are sent to the various government offices and agents, as well as the Vatican, BIS, and those needing to be noticed by registered mail, and Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
One of her articles detailing the impersonation scheme
https://annavonreitz.com/impersonation2.pdf
They are not talking about throwing out the constitution! What they are saying is restore the original 13th amendment as ratified in 1819 then changed without a single Vote of citizens or congress in 1865 which also led to the Rothschilds/Rockefellers to steal thus country by, buying up all of the 30 year bonds congress sold supposedly to us(citizens) after the Civil War wich was this countries first bankruptcy, which they expected would bring the country back to even keel financially, but in 1903 a Rothschild and a Rockefeller interrupted congress by saying we have all of these 30 year bonds and you owe us X amount plus interest, subsequently bankrupting this country again, then convinced congress to start the first national bank later to become the federal reserve which is neither federal or a reserve!
It would've also precluded Lincoln from serving in the unincorporated bodies of the American government, and was part of the cause of the south walking out of session that's never discussed, and that caused the third and fourth bodies to be dissolved. See my post about the 3 constitutions with links I just left on here.
https://annavonreitz.com/original13thamendment.pdf
"About the Supposedly "Missing" Original 13th Amendment.... A Recap of the Scam"
https://americanstateassembly.com/blog/author-anna-von-reitz/why-you-are-the-answer/
"In this case the Plaintiff asks the United States Supreme Court to provide declaratory relief and to restore the Original 13th Amendment and provide restitution…."
" So why isn’t it in effect right now? And is this something that the United States Supreme Court can correct?"
http://annavonreitz.com/lincolntherat.pdf
Update: Time to End the Civil War: the Necessity of Expatriation
"I am republishing here the entire complete text of research on what really happened at the end of the Civil War---- and I want everyone reading this to note that there was never a formal Peace Treaty ending the Civil War, just declarations by President Johnson proclaiming peace on the land jurisdiction. (See below.)"
http://annavonreitz.com/whenwefinderror.pdf
"Quote ---"The following 15 points are based upon factual historical evidence:"
"http://annavonreitz.com/forwardto14th.pdf
"We are publishing documents that have been "sealed" by the courts. If you
didn't get a copy prior to them being sealed by the courts, you won't be able to
get a copy without a Court Order now, so be thankful that other Americans were
on the ball 55 years ago. And that we are making copies provided to us
available to all Fifty State Assemblies now."
They are linked in the article
https://annavonreitz.com/14thamendmenthoax.pdf
How about if we start by prosecuting the fraudsters before we toss out the Constitution?
They are not talking about throwing out the constitution! What they are saying is restore the original 13th amendment as ratified in 1819 then changed without a single Vote of citizens or congress in 1865 which also led to the Rothschilds/Rockefellers to steal thus country by, buying up all of the 30 year bonds congress sold supposedly to us(citizens) after the Civil War wich was this countries first bankruptcy, which they expected would bring the country back to even keel financially, but in 1903 a Rothschild and a Rockefeller interrupted congress by saying we have all of these 30 year bonds and you owe us X amount plus interest, subsequently bankrupting this country again, then convinced congress to start the first national bank later to become the federal reserve which is neither federal or a reserve!
It seems like conflating two discussions. One about the veracity of the 13th Amendment as currently written and another about Trump saying the 2020 election was so fraudulent that it warrants tossing out all rules, regulations and even the Constitution for a remedy. On the latter, the fraud has to be identified and prosecuted before we can even contemplate something as radical as ignoring the Constitution and presumably using military force to seek a remedy. As an aside, I agree that you can't serve two masters and all of our "dual citizens" in Congress bother me greatly.
The proof is out there and nothing is getting done about it because we the people are not demanding it. Joe Biden facts... 2012 as Vice President committed quid pro quo to Ukraine to remove their government's version of theor attorney General from investigating Buristma gas and oil where his son Hunter worked just after being booted out of the Navy Reserve For drug use, as well as all the proof that has come out of congressional hearings that have also found proof that the Biden family took millions from both Ukraine and CCP China before even being elected as president, all that proof has come out and is public knowledge yet he is still the president!....hmm want more facts?
The Biden crime family needs to be prosecuted along with many others from the DC Swamp cesspool, but I'm not sure what this has to do with the 13th Amendment or Trump's call to ignore laws, rules and the constitution because of election fraud.
I read his statement as corruptions want to do the things that you are saying Trump wants to. Or did I read it wrong. After all, it is the subject of the sentence. Nowhere did I see that Trump wants this.
Did you see the image of his Trump Truth post?
... the freedoms we throw away today are the freedoms our Grandchildren will never know existed.
Trump is not saying that! He has no desire to change the Constitution! He is revealing the plans of the Democrat traitors.
When Trump is elected President why not do what President Lincoln did in 1863:
Habeas Corpus Suspension Act
Tuesday, March 3, 1863
Only for duration of civil unrest?
Representative Thaddeus Stevens introduced the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act in December 1862. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.
Representative Thaddeus Stevens introduced the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act in December 1862. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act authorizes the president of the United States to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, which normally enforces the right of a prisoner's case to be examined by a judge to determine if their detainment is lawful. Six months after the act, on September 15, 1863, President Lincoln suspends habeas corpus throughout the Union for any cases relating to prisoners of war, spies, traitors, or Union soldiers. It allows for extended detainment of prisoners without jury trials. At the end of the war, President Andrew Johnson uses the act to overturn a writ of habeas corpus issued in the case of Mary Surratt, who is implicated in the assassination of Lincoln and later executed despite the continuing legal questions over her arrest and conviction. After the war, the suspension gradually resides in the North and South, as various provisions expire or are repealed or replaced.
Re-read what the original 13th amendment stated that would instantly remove the likes of the Biden family and all others that that have done the same to include the Bush family
We the people need to see him through this . With all the opposition to his campaign and his life , nothing is definately. Godspeed and god bless🙏🏼
How is this recent? His post is dated ‘22?
Lone Gunmen and Tell Tale Signs of an MK Ultra Assassin
Second failed Trump assassination by mind controlled drone
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/lone-gunmen-and-tell-tale-signs-of
------
Proberta:
If you want to know who is behind the false-flag shootings, fake assassination attempts, mass mind manipulations, and
how They do it and why, watch this one movie.
Its all there, hiding in plain sight.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120885/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_8_nm_0_in_0_q_wag%2520the%2520dog
------
Smacko:
stuck on Trojan Trump
nose in rump
without a face mask
PappaVaxx we want him back! ?
Q;o)
911 impotence led to Virus Scam subservience
https://archive.org/details/TRUMPSGREATESTFLIPFLOPOFALLTIME
---
Escape The DemoRub!
IF congress does not pass an amendment and send it to states to ratify—then a new convention would have to be held and you DO NOT want that. delegates to a convention have plenipotenary powers.